I am writing this report in hopes of reflecting the Southern California perspective
on grading to the overall scheme of the new grading guide. I believe that the standards
of comic grading, not only have changed over the years, but they have changed more
than once. Secondly I believe that there are slight differences in grading standards
based on geographical region of collectors. My personal standards have been taught
to me over the years by learning what a customer expects from a particular grade
as well as what I expect and by looking at what other dealers offer at specific
grades. I started buying collections and back issues in 1976, back then there were
basically three grades, (good, fine and near mint/mint) which most dealers priced
their inventory at. The price spread back then was usually $1.00 for Good $1.50
for Fine and $2.00 for Mint. The price spread was very low. Most collectors thought
to buy the cheapest one so you can get more for your money. By the mid eighties
the spread was more like $1.00 for good $3.00 for fine and $9.00 for mint. At this
point it was becoming obvious to most collectors that the nicer copies were good
investments. I also think that this split helped start the creation of grade specific
collector groups. Before this you bought whatever condition you could find, because
the price spreads were so small. As the 1990's started the new comic market was
in high gear and this bought a lot of new collectors into the market. They were
used to new comics (that are by definition high grade) and wanted their back issues
to be as nice as possible. Supply was low and demand was high, the top prices began
to jump ever higher.
About this time (1992) the first Overstreet grading guide had been released
using the now defunct 100 point system, this book was a great attempt to resolve
some of the issues that were constantly coming up between the old timer with the
older looser and less defined grading standards and the newbees that wanted nice
books and were not willing to accept the status quo of the time. While the 100 point
system was not wildly accepted by dealers or collectors it had introduced the OWL
card for paper whiteness level. This card was a major step in tightening up grading
standards. I still keep mine handy, even though it can use a few more color scales.
As prices of high grades books continued to climb, the higher grade books standards
were again made tighter by picky customers who were willing to spend big if they
could find the finest examples of a particular issue. Another odd thing that happened
around the mid to late 1990's was that high grade (VF/NM to Mint) and low grade
(FA-VG-) books were the only one being collected. It was rare to find any body wanting
the middle grade books in those days. Then came the first real downward adjustment
of prices in 27TH and 28th editions of the Overstreet Price guides. This was a healthy
thing for the market and within two years silver age sales started to increase again.
For example Amazing Spiderman #1 was going for $275 in Good in 1990 and listed for
$1200 by 1996, by 1998 the 28th OPG it was back down to $700. Today, four years
later it still lists for only $800. In the late 1990's two major events happened
in our hobby. The first was the adoption of the new 10-point grading system and
the second was the introduction of third party grading. The ten point grading system
was less confusing and was a better overlay of the old word-grade system then the
previous 100-point system. The first and so far only grading service to enter our
market was Comics Guarantee Company aka CGC. It took a while for most dealers to
be willing to pay someone other than himself to grade their books, but after record
sales of high-grade books were being realized, CGC caught on quickly. This was mostly
fueled by internet sales where shaky first time collectors had no idea how to grade
a book, but felt they could rely on a third party system for fairness. The only
real complaint that I know of from most collectors is that the CGC has never published
their grading standards; I hope they, and the industry, as a whole will adopt this
book.
|